Skip to main content

Idealism, Realism, and the Bible

     Plato (428-347 B.C.) and his student Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) are two of Greek’s greatest thinkers. Plato’s thoughts have given society the philosophical framework referred to as idealism which teaches that truth and reality are found in an external and eternal ideal. His student Aristotle rejected many of the tenets formulated by his teacher and built the philosophical system called realism which teaches that reality and truth are found in the physical matter of nature. Although a discerning Christian will not embrace either philosophy wholeheartedly, he can benefit from evaluating them both on a scriptural basis. Both idealism and realism have aspects that are consistent with biblical principles and aspects that stand in opposition to them. The value of both philosophies is found in their alignment with what is revealed in God’s Word.

     Plato taught that the physical matter of the world was not reality but rather a reflection or shadow of the concept of perfect idealism. Christians see this philosophy taught in Scripture in the act of creation. Man is created in the image of the perfection of God (Genesis 1:27). Man is not God, but as an image-bearer of the Divine being, he can reflect the true Ideal and thereby accomplish the purpose for which he was created, to glorify God (Isaiah 43:21, I Corinthians 10:31). Christians also see agreement with the axiology of idealism taught in Philippians 4:8. By challenging believers to dwell on those things which possess ideal truth, honesty, justice, purity, and beauty, God reminds them that there are eternal ideals that He expects them to value.

     Even though idealism can be seen as an acceptable philosophy to the Christian, there exist problematic facets in the philosophy that discerning believers must address. In contrast to the tenets of pure idealism, God ascribes great value to His physical creation. Idealism rejects the physical, but God Himself calls His physical creation good numerous times in Genesis 1. Psalm 104:31 reminds believers the Lord rejoices greatly in His creation. Believers should follow His example and rejoice in His creation while striving to conform to the ideal He sets forth in Scripture.

     While Plato’s idealism finds truth only in an eternal ideal, Aristotle’s realism rejects the eternal ideal in favor of truth that is revealed through nature and what is observed empirically. With careful analysis, there is biblical truth to be found in the notion of realism. Psalm 19 clearly and beautifully teaches that God’s physical creation teaches truth and is valuable. This same Psalm even references human speech and language as revealing God’s truth. Matthew 5:45 references the sun and the rain as physical evidences of God’s truth as well. The Scripture clearly supports the thought that reality and truth can be found through the observation and analysis of the general revelation of God’s creation.

     Although realism can be seen in Scripture, there is also a real danger for the Christian in the wholehearted acceptance of this philosophy. The most concise argument against embracing the totality of philosophical realism is found in Romans 1:25. In this passage, Paul reminds Rome that a focus on the creation over the creator is not a biblical focus. When man bows to empiricism and embraces as real and valuable only those things he is ignoring the clear teaching of I Corinthians 4:18: this physical reality is only temporary.

     For the Christian, the Greek philosophies of idealism and realism hold value. As with any philosophical notion, they must be studied and appreciated under the authority of God’s Word. All truth is God’s truth. Those ideas found in idealism that align with Scripture can be embraced, not because of the wisdom of Plato but because of the truth of God’s Word. The tenets of realism that are taught clearly in Scripture are not right because of Aristotle’s brilliance, but because of the infallibility of the Holy Scriptures. With the Bible as the starting point, discerning believers can analyze carefully any man-made philosophy, accept those portions that are right, and reject portions which are wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: The Successful Christian School by A.A. Baker

  A.A. Baker constructs his work The Successful Christian School on four major ideas: foundational purpose, curricular program, prioritization of personnel, and management of finances. Grounded in the biblical philosophy that when God wants something to be done and it is done in the way He demonstrates, it will be a success, Baker’s suggestions lead Christian school stakeholders to consider carefully the proven methods used by Pensacola Christian Academy since its founding in 1954.      Baker leads readers to an understanding of his major concepts with simplicity and abundant anecdotal evidence. The foundational purpose for a Christian school is obedience to and glorification of God Almighty. Baker reminds readers in chapter 1, “The only reason that you should start a Christian school is because [sic] it is God’s will that you do so” (16). Using Colossians 3:23 as support, he urges readers to work “heartily as unto the Lord” (14). In chapters 3, 4, and 13, Baker uses stories from

Pragmatism and Existentialism in Education

     It should come as no surprise that in a conversation pertaining to educational philosophy, conservative fundamental Christians tend to lean toward the traditional. The traditional philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas resonate more with Christian sensibilities. While an individual with a biblical worldview will find more in common with traditional philosophies, he would do well to analyze the more modern philosophies of pragmatism and existentialism through the lens of Scripture, accept those ideas which align, and reject those that do not. John Dewey, pragmatist      Pragmatism holds to the view that flexibility due to an ever-changing society is the key to education. John Dewey’s man-centered humanistic thought serves as the foundation of pragmatism. A pragmatist holds that right and wrong constantly change based on what works to solve a particular problem. In the classroom, this view is evidenced through a very child-centered approach, a lack of a strong au

Curricular Choices in the Christian School

      The American Heritage Dictionary defines curriculum as “All the courses of study offered by an educational institution.” Although textbooks play a significant role in those courses, the total course of study at an educational institution includes all the materials, methods, and activities that contribute to the learning process. For Christian schools, the foundational principles of all curricular choices are found in God’s Word. For believers, the Bible serves as the basis for practice in all of life; naturally, the Bible guides and informs believers’ choices in the Christian school as well. Scripture should serve as the basis for curricular choices in the areas of course offerings, textbooks, and teaching methods.      The administrative leadership at Christian schools must be certain that they are offering courses that meet the pattern for child development given in the Bible. Luke 2:52 shows that the only perfect Child to walk the earth, Jesus Christ, matured in a four-fol